ATISR Editorial Policies – Standards for Academic Publishing

In today’s research-driven world, academic integrity and publishing standards are more important than ever. The Applied and Theoretical Information Systems Research (ATISR) platform is committed to advancing high-quality, peer-reviewed academic work in the field of information systems and business research. Its editorial policies serve as the backbone of this commitment – guiding authors, reviewers, and editors through a transparent, ethical, and rigorous publication process.

This article provides a clear overview of ATISR’s editorial policies, detailing the standards that govern manuscript submissions, peer review, ethical compliance, and publication practices.

Mission

ATISR’s editorial policies are rooted in its mission to promote excellence in theoretical and applied research. The journal focuses on interdisciplinary work, especially studies that bridge academic inquiry with real-world practice. As such, its editorial standards prioritize originality, relevance, clarity, and methodological rigor.

The goal is not just to publish more papers – but to publish work that informs, challenges, and contributes meaningfully to academic and professional communities.

Submission

Authors submitting to ATISR must adhere to clear submission guidelines designed to ensure quality and consistency.

Key requirements include:

• Originality – Submissions must be unpublished and not under review elsewhere.
• Formatting – Manuscripts should follow the prescribed style guide, typically APA or IEEE.
• Abstract and keywords – A clear abstract (150–250 words) and 4–6 keywords are required.
• Length – Standard articles are typically 5,000–8,000 words, excluding references.
• Supporting documentation – Tables, figures, and appendices should be properly cited and formatted.

Submissions that fail to meet these criteria may be desk-rejected before peer review begins.

Review

ATISR uses a double-blind peer review process, which ensures impartiality by keeping both author and reviewer identities anonymous.

The review process follows these steps:

1. Initial screening by the editor for scope, formatting, and basic quality
2. Assignment to 2–3 reviewers with relevant subject expertise
3. Evaluation criteria including originality, theoretical grounding, research design, clarity, and contribution
4. Review outcome – accept, minor revisions, major revisions, or reject
5. Editorial decision based on reviewers’ feedback and final revisions

Reviewers are expected to respond within 4–6 weeks, and authors are usually given 2–4 weeks to revise their work depending on the extent of changes needed.

Ethics

ATISR adheres to strict ethical standards consistent with COPE (Committee on Publication Ethics) guidelines. Authors, reviewers, and editors are expected to uphold principles of honesty, transparency, and accountability.

Ethical responsibilities include:

• Plagiarism prevention – All papers are checked using plagiarism detection tools.
• Data integrity – Authors must disclose sources, methods, and conflicts of interest.
• Authorship clarity – All listed authors must have made substantial contributions.
• No multiple submissions – Simultaneous submissions to other journals are prohibited.
• Disclosure of funding – Any financial or institutional support must be declared.

Ethical violations may result in rejection, retraction, or permanent ban from future submissions.

Open Access

ATISR supports open-access publishing, ensuring that all published work is freely available to readers worldwide. This model promotes wide dissemination and citation of research without paywalls.

What this means for authors:

• Authors typically retain copyright under a Creative Commons license
• Articles are indexed in academic databases and search engines
• No hidden subscription or access fees for readers

Some ATISR journals may charge article processing fees (APCs) to support open-access operations, which are clearly disclosed during submission.

Copyright

Authors retain copyright to their work but grant ATISR the right to publish and distribute it under open-access terms. Most publications use the CC BY or CC BY-NC license, which allows others to reuse the work with attribution, and in some cases, for non-commercial purposes only.

Re-use of figures, images, or substantial text from other sources must include proper permissions and citations.

Appeals

If an author disagrees with an editorial decision, they may file an appeal. Appeals must be submitted in writing and provide a detailed rationale, including responses to reviewers’ comments. The editorial board will review the appeal, and decisions are final.

ATISR maintains transparency in appeals but upholds academic judgment and peer review as the foundation of editorial decisions.

Revisions

Authors asked to revise their submissions must:

• Provide a point-by-point response to reviewer comments
• Submit both a clean version and a tracked changes version of the revised manuscript
• Meet the revision deadline as communicated in the editorial letter

Failure to comply with revision standards may result in delays or rejection.

Retractions

In rare cases, ATISR will issue retractions if published work is found to involve:

• Plagiarism
• Data fabrication or falsification
• Unethical research practices
• Duplicate publication

Retractions are publicly noted and permanently linked to the original article. The journal takes research misconduct seriously and upholds academic integrity as a core value.

FAQs